Editorial policy

How we review AI filmmaking tools

Every review is designed to help a filmmaker make a decision. We distinguish between information published by a provider, features visible in the product, and our editorial judgment about how the tool fits a production workflow.

What we evaluate

  • Workflow fit: the job the product completes and the production stage it supports.
  • Creative control: references, continuity, editing, model choice, and iteration.
  • Usability: how clearly a creator can move from an idea to a usable asset.
  • Pricing: plan shape, credits, licensing, and costs that affect a buying decision.
  • Limitations: missing workflow pieces, friction, uncertainty, and better alternatives.

Evidence and screenshots

We prefer screenshots of real editors, generators, dashboards, timelines, canvases, and other product surfaces. A screenshot is included only when it helps demonstrate a workflow. Marketing claims are not presented as hands-on findings, and a product is not described as tested unless we completed the relevant interaction.

Prices, updates, and corrections

AI products change often. Prices are a decision aid rather than a guarantee, and the provider remains the source of truth at purchase time. Material corrections are made when reliable new evidence is available. Readers and product teams can send corrections to [email protected].

Commercial relationships

Reviews are not sold. When the site has a commercial relationship that could influence a reader's decision, it will be disclosed on the relevant page. Melies is built by the same team and is identified as an alternative, not treated as an independent third-party recommendation.